Joseph Smith Lamanites (2) (1)

Race and Representation in Latter-day Saint Art

Although text has been the primary medium of communication in the restored gospel, there are exciting ways in which fresh visual depictions can expand our understanding and appreciation—including in sensitive areas like race and gender.

As art historians researching the art and visual culture of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the broader Latter-day Saint world, we see benefits to more scholarly discourse on race in art within the Church and its culture. The last decades have witnessed a dramatic increase in scholarship exploring race in historical and contemporary Mormonism. Yet much work remains to be done in addressing the role of images in constructing and promulgating Latter-day Saint views on race and ethnicity. Perhaps the critical importance of texts in the Church has overshadowed the communicative power of images. Studying a religion so centrally defined through written words, it’s easy to assume that images are always accessories rather than central to creating meaning—i.e. seeing images simply as illustrations. The naturalistic style typical of Latter-day Saint art (especially in the Church’s first hundred years) doesn’t help, either. Many artists invite us to see their polished, realistic works as straightforward representations of reality, not as subjective visions mediated through religious, cultural, and ideological perspectives.

A quick study of just one example suggests how much is missing when images are treated simply as illustrations—and the potential insights images offer into Latter-day Saints’ evolving understanding of race. In 1844, Samuel Brannan engaged the H. N. Robinson Lithography Company to mass-produce an image drawn by Edward Williams Clay depicting Joseph Smith speaking to a group of Native Americans (depicted in the featured image of this article above). The image is more than just a representation of figures who happen to possess particular racial identities. It is an argument about race, employing visual rhetoric to advance specific perspectives about embodied identity in the social context in which it was produced.

For instance, Brannan’s lithograph affirms that the Book of Mormon was a record of the ancestors of Native Americans—Joseph Smith holds a prominently labeled copy at his side. Many early Latter-day Saints were excited by his prophecy that Native Americans would reawaken to their alleged Lamanite identities and join the Latter-day Saint millenarian project. Beyond what it reveals about the Latter-day Saints’ teachings about Lamanites in that period, the lithograph also helps illuminate how this theology intertwined with contemporary understanding in the faith about racial difference. The Native figures are derived from the artist’s imagination rather than observation, but the stereotype they represent is not the “hostile savage” threatening settlement (then ascendant in post-Jacksonian America), but the earlier vision of the “noble savage.” The figures’ regal bearing, elegant ornamentation, and Roman-nosed profiles associate them with the visual tradition of Native Americans as embodying the virtues of an enlightened, natural existence. Many Latter-day Saint viewers were willing, especially in the era before the settlement of Utah, to imagine Native Americans as potential allies rather than opponents. The lithograph captures the optimistic belief that Native people across the continent would join the Latter-day Saint world—the mountains in the background set the image much further west than Nauvoo.

How should we address historical artworks that carry spiritual significance to many Latter-day Saints, but may have been perpetuated or been influenced by attitudes of white superiority?

Yet the lithograph also hints at the racial inequities that would ultimately undercut the Latter-day Saints’ efforts to convert Indigenous Peoples. The artist did not put Smith and his Native listeners on equal footing. Instead, the prophet towers over them while they sit at his feet. Emanating from a world in which white Americans struggled to imagine true parity between Native Americans and themselves, the image takes for granted that civilizing and moralizing knowledge flowed in only one direction. This was compounded for nineteenth-century Latter-day Saint viewers by the understanding that “Lamanites” were degraded remnants of an Israelite civilization; consistently, they equated “redemption” not with the flowering of Native cultural expression or political power, but with assimilation into Church culture and society.

Brannan’s lithograph is not particularly revealing as an illustration of history—it’s an imagined scene generalizing multiple events by an artist who wasn’t present and hadn’t ever seen any of the participants. But when studied as a cultural document, the image offers significant insight into the religious and social perspectives of early Latter-day Saints. This is only one short case study—and much more could be said about this single artwork. But as this example suggests, images offer enormous potential for increasing our understanding of Latter-day Saint views on race. 

Recent scholarship on nineteenth-century Latter-day Saint art and visual culture reveals how these images not only documented but also actively participated in Latter-day Saint colonial expansion. Much more work remains to be done.  Although there is some scholarship devoted to the intersections of Latter-day Saint culture and race in twentieth and twenty-first-century artworks, this has been neither an extensive nor a sustained enterprise. A deeper analysis of the representation of Native Americans in the paintings of Arnold Friberg and Minerva Teichert, for example, may reveal additional colonialist elements in early Latter-day Saint cultural practices. The recent explosion of interest in depicting the feminine divine in Latter-day Saint art, and in particular Heavenly Mother is also worth noting—reflecting a global church clearly capacious enough to produce images that challenge the long-time Latter-day Saint visual rhetoric that has predominantly represented white subjects. Works by Richard Lasisi Olagunju, Melissa Tshikamba, Kwani Povi Winder, and others point to new and important directions in the contemporary age.

Hence, we are launching an edited volume on race and representation in Latter-day Saint art because existing scholarship only just begins to scratch the surface. There are numerous other topics ripe for exploration: how have Latter-day Saints envisioned Lamanites in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries? How did images promote or challenge Latter-day Saints’ shifting understanding of people of African descent, before, during, or after the “priesthood ban”? How are international members of the Church creating images to represent this vivid diversity in the increasingly global Church? How have Black and Indigenous Latter-day Saints of color fashioned self-representations that challenge racist stereotypes that may remain among some? And how should we address historical artworks that carry spiritual significance to many Latter-day Saints, but may have been perpetuated or been influenced by attitudes of white superiority?  We invite scholars of all disciplines and backgrounds to propose essays on these or any other topics related to race in Latter-day Saint visual culture in the hope that more critical discussion will help bring about a better understanding.

About the authors

Nathan Rees

Nathan Rees is a professor of art history at the University of West Georgia focusing on the intersection of race and religion. He also serves as a curator at the Sacred Harp Museum. He has a PhD in art history from the University of Maryland. [email protected]

Heather Belnap

Heather Belnap is an Art History & Women's Studies Professor at BYU and the Director of BYU European Studies. She has a Ph.D. from the University of Kansas. [email protected]
On Key

You Might Also Like

LA Times Features Public Square Magazine

Several of the folks from Public Square Magazine were interviewed recently by Meredith Blake at the LA Times. She highlighted the ways that Latter-day Saints have reacted to the show Under the Banner of Heaven. Blake did an excellent job of representing our takes on the show. But we did have a couple of observations about the show mentioned in the interview that inevitably couldn’t make it, so I wanted to add those here for those who were curious. Jeb Pyre, the fictional detective portrayed by Andrew Garfield, is the main character viewers see the story through. But none of the four people being interviewed felt like Pyre was a good depiction of a thoughtful Latter-day Saint. Pyre is depicted as a well-established, thoughtful, fully-committed member of the Latter-day Saint community, yet the way he reacted to the information he learned felt less like the way an adult would respond to learning new things, and more like an adolescent response. Pyre’s character did resonate with some of us, from when we were teenagers. His character feels like it was written by someone who left the Church when they were sixteen, and remained mentally stuck in that place, and then tried to project those thoughts into a grown man, hoping to give them more validity. Consequently, the character feels flimsy. One of the other major observations from the interview was that we worried that the Church felt like it was part of the problem in the Lafferty murder when at the time, most members of the Church felt that they were part of the victims. These two men who had recently been excommunicated came back for revenge. In fact, the stake president was on their hit list. It seemed to place most Latter-day Saints on the opposite side of this issue than they felt at the time. The show’s writer, for his part, responded to these by engaging in the kind of motte and bailey techniques Cassandra Hedelius recently did a good job of identifying for us here at Public Square. Thanks again to Meredith Blake for her thoughtful interview.    

Remembering Lincoln’s Inaugural Address on this President’s Day

As we celebrate President’s Day today, let us be reminded of Abraham Lincoln’s inaguaral address he gave on March 4, 1865. Those words spoken then are just as relevant toay as they were in 1865. “With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation’s wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.”