POLITICS

Politicizing the Pandemic

Living in a pandemic is scary enough. But when we can’t figure out what is true (and even the data gets politicized), it makes things all that harder. That makes it even more important to think critically and look into different perspectives.

Anybody else sick and tired of COVID?

This disease has taken over our lives.  I stood with my daughter outside her school on her first day back and “some lady” came up to me and said hello.  I finally realized that it was my cousin whom I know very well, but because of her mask, I did not recognize her at first.  I see children with mask rashes on their faces from wearing a mask for hours on end like surgeons.

The only thing that makes the pandemic worse is how political it has become. 

It seems that this pandemic, like many other aspects of our lives right now, is very polarizing. And emotionally draining.  People are either fearful of the disease or angry at being told what to do. Decisions are being made, and then a couple of weeks later they are reversed, as more information comes to light. And it seems that people on all sides are convinced they are following unassailable medical advice and science. 

In mid-July, there was an article on the daily pandemic numbers for the state of Utah where I live.  One commenter blamed spikes happening on the “Republican-controlled states” mentioning Texas and Florida.  

The respected Johns Hopkins coronavirus statistics website told a different story. In addition to Texas and Florida, California, Oregon, Washington and other states (not controlled by Republicans) were having spikes at the same time.

While the commenters were certainly partisan, the data did not appear to be.

So, I decided to dig deeper and look at how the COVID deaths in the US compare state-by-state. I obtained statistics for the deaths from the CDC and the statistics for the populations of each state from the Census Bureau.  I then cross-referenced the death count with a list of which party controls the state. This was determined by the party of the governor, due to the nature of most government responses to COVID (unless more than 75% of state legislators came from the opposite party of the governor). 

What I found is that in spite of the popular perception, Democrat-controlled states had a 38% higher death rate than Republican-controlled states (see my full calculations below).

Data can always be used to support one’s own point of view in regards to the pandemic.

Clearly, there are many factors that go into the overall percentage of COVID deaths—from the relative density of a place to its age and obesity levels. How a state bureaucracy leads and directs a public health response is only one factor, and even that doesn’t take into account interactions with national policies. But that’s precisely the point—it’s all more complex than any compelling soundbite admits. 

I offer these numbers not to suggest that Democrats have mishandled the pandemic to a greater degree than Republican, but as a caution against over-politicizing a pandemic that should unite us. And I would add, in an angry atmosphere where Republican-led states are being accused of doing worse than Democrat-led states, it does seem significant to point out the measurable difference in death rates we are seeing state by state.   

Data can always be used to support one’s own point of view in regards to the pandemic. Once while listening to NPR I heard the following thought, “with so many media options now, we can listen to people that think exactly like us and not need to hear any opposing viewpoints.” I can see this in the current COVID discussion. This thought is also masterfully explained by Destin Sandlin (Smarter Every Day) in a presentation he did at Skepticon (at mark 30:10 in the video).

There is a safety in cultivating an atmosphere where all our voices can be heard.  I guess I’m taking my turn now.  

One more thing:  When the constitution was framed the powers of the federal government were intentionally limited to certain things.  The idea was that the states (or local government) should be in charge of their own people with the exception of a few areas that needed to be federally controlled.  I agree with this philosophy.  This is especially true when it comes to how to control and handle COVID.  It’s been said plenty, but it’s worth saying again:  what is required in New York and New Jersey is drastically different than what is needed in Alaska and Wyoming. There is no one-size-fits-all solution.  

It would also be great to agree that, well, we don’t have to agree on any of this. Healthy discussion that allows thoughtful disagreement (yes including about COVID) is such a breath of fresh air these days. 

On that note, I was heartened at what happened when I decided to share these thoughts on Facebook.  When I did, I felt some trepidation and did not know what the reaction would be.  Pleasantly, most of the resulting dialogue was civil and led to discussions on a wide variety of topics. I was able to have a productive exchange with two of my cousins who are on the other side of the political aisle.  While none of us changed our opinion of whom to vote for, it did allow us to voice our opinions and get a perspective of what is behind “the other guy’s” thoughts

Well, that’s enough commentary from me.  Please go out this weekend—or stay in and watch a good old fashion John Wayne movie.

But also remember:  There are good reasons people are skeptical of some of the things they’re hearing—including from reputable sources. Let’s all be informed voters who think for ourselves and not just emotional ones.

About the author

Jeff Hale

Jeff Hale is the President of R&M Engineering, a structural and civil engineering firm in the industrial sector of northern Utah.
On Key

You Might Also Like

Most Religious Groups Support Abortion

Nearly 2/3 of Americans support legal abortion,  This even includes religious Americans.  The outliers are white evangelicals, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Latter-day Saints and Hispanic Protestants.

Soldier Movie Doesn’t Uplift

A contemporary set movie, “Valiant One” follows a US military unit in South Korea when they are blown off course and crash across the border in North Korea with a civilian tech specialist aboard. The film is putatively about the growth of Brock, who is thrust into commanding the unit after the crash. As the opening title cards tell us, “Heroes’ Aren’t Born. They Are Made.” And the  We see him as he changes from struggling with his major decisions to beginning to make one. In one well-structured scene, the farmer catches them hiding in the barn. After a standoff, Brock approaches the farmer and de-escalates the situation.  We see him and his soldiers as they recognize the humanity of their enemies, and make tough decisions. Ultimately, though, the areas he’s growing in don’t have a deep resonance because they aren’t Christ-like attributes. And the broader moral universe of the film is nihilist. It’s taut and well-structured and manages to tell a complete story in less than 80 minutes. It clearly is influenced by the years of experience director Steve Barnett has spent on the studio side of things. But it’s also clear that he lacks the artistic vision that elevates those essential storytelling blocks into an actual story. In some ways, the film reminds me of a paint-by-number before it’s been completed. Everything is in the right place, but it’s clearly not art or even particularly interesting to look at yet.  The characters fall flat, particularly the two leads. Which keeps the story beats from ever coming together into a coherent whole. They have the kind of tragic backstories you’d expect, but they feel disconnected from the actions and motivations we actually see them enact. Eventually, even the plot feels like it’s doing circles, revisiting the same moral dilemmas and crises, without enough new character growth to warrant it. I can imagine there’s an audience for this movie. For those who love war movies, this one is clear and comprehensible. And if you are automatically invested in the uniforms, you have clear stakes that give the film energy and a through line that is enhanced by an aggressive hip-hop score. The film will probably most resonate with those with a similar backstory as Brock, who can see themselves as him. I imagine watching his growth would make this movie particularly meaningful to them.  The film is R-rated. It is not particularly gory, but there is certainly war like violence, and we see many deaths, including executions. And the screenwriter went to lengths to capture the authentic pitter-patter of the way soldiers speak. But this means lots and lots of over-the-top pointless never-ending crassness and profanity. The larger moral of the film is pretty bland, and so by the end I felt degraded rather than lifted up. War movies can certainly uplift when they tell the right stories. This is not one of them. I wouldn’t watch it with my children, even when they were grown. If someone did, I would suggest asking them questions about the ethics of survival and the nature of leadership.  One and a half out of five stars. Valiant One releases in the theaters January 31, 2025.